Skip to content

Kelsey Farish

  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references
  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references

Facebook comments as “reviews”

October 17, 2017October 22, 2020 Kelsey Farish Leave a comment
Facebook comments as “reviews”

Reviews are powerful marketing tools. From making dinner reservations to buying a new pair of shoes, I very rarely part with my hard-earned cash before checking out the ratings and comments online. I also follow quite a few restaurants, designers, photographers, and fitness bloggers on Facebook, and often see people leave reviews there, too. But what can a business actually do with those comments? And if you leave a review on a company’s Facebook page, what are your rights over what you’ve written?

Public posts on  Facebook.
Facebook’s terms of service are clear that when a user publishes content or information using the “public” setting – such as a review – they are allowing everyone to access and use that information. It also allows for the content to be associated with the user specifically (i.e., by using their name and profile picture).

This is a helpful starting point, but Facebook’s terms of service are essentially a contract between Facebook and the reviewer, and not a contract between a particular seller (restaurant, entrepreneur, designer, company, etc. ) and the reviewer. As such, a reviewer could object to a seller re-posting their comments elsewhere. From the perspective of the seller, this is likely to cause inconvenience, and potentially cost time and money which can easily be avoided.

Recommended Approach
Although public Facebook comments are in the public domain as noted above, I would advise a seller to seek out the reviewer’s explicit permission before using their comment as a testimonial on another website for marketing purposes.

Do obtain permission. A seller should get in touch directly with positive reviewers, thanking them for their review, and simply ask whether they will allow use of their review on another platform. If permission is granted via Facebook messenger or another form of written communication, the seller would also have a chain of evidence to prove permission, in compliance with the Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP) guidelines. Maintaining this evidence is important, as regulators have in the past upheld complaints from users where businesses have been unable to prove they had consent to use particular comments.

Once permission to use the reviews is obtained, a seller should not change the words of any endorsements or otherwise distort the reviewer’s message. It is also best practice for the seller to ensure the authenticity of any reviews, and only use endorsements from verified purchasers (members, subscribers, etc).

Another thing to mention is that using a reviewer’s full name in the testimonial may constitute personal data under the General Data Protection Regulations. A seller could shorten the individual’s name when re-using their review, to avoid any potential data protection issues. For example, reviews could be attributed to a shortened name and location such as: “Tabitha R., Scotland.” This approach may also lead to more people giving their permission to use their reviews on your website, as they will not be as easily identifiable.

In any event, if you’re a seller or business using Facebook to market your product or services, it’s always prudent to incorporate a disclaimer onto your Facebook page, as well as any website. As an individual posting reviews online, don’t forget that what you write on someone’s page may end up somewhere else.

commercialcopyrightecommerceintellectual property

Related Posts

A lawyer walks into an art gallery…
A lawyer walks into an art gallery…
Photograph licences: 5 things to know before you sign!
Photograph licences: 5 things to know before you sign!
Deepfakes and the Law: an excerpt from my Society of Computers & Law Webinar
Deepfakes and the Law: an excerpt from my Society of Computers & Law Webinar
Is someone stealing your Instagram posts?
Is someone stealing your Instagram posts?

Post navigation

Online Intermediary Liability in EU Copyright Enforcement (2013)
Lawyers with a sense of humour: Strange?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Kelsey Farish

Kelsey Farish

Media + Tech Lawyer

Got lost on my way to drama school, now a media and technology lawyer in London.

I write about deepfakes, publicity, privacy, advertising, the audiovisual sector, and creative industries from a legal perspective.

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

You might also like to read:

Gunpowder on Primetime: were torture and execution scenes too violent?
Expression ➤ November 5, 2017

Gunpowder on Primetime: were torture and execution scenes too violent?

The BBC’s new show has been criticised for being “unnecessarily gruesome and brutal,” with some viewers saying they became physically ill due to the graphic torture and execution scenes. Is portraying such violence necessary to...

Read More
A lawyer walks into an art gallery…
Copyright ➤ January 31, 2021

A lawyer walks into an art gallery…

My reflections from Week 1 of the CopyrightX programme at Harvard Law School. Can bad art benefit from copyright protection? Yes! In fact, even something that is not artistic at all can be copyright protected,...

Read More
Museum & Gallery Exhibits, AW 17/18
Uncategorized ➤ October 23, 2017

Museum & Gallery Exhibits, AW 17/18

Recommendations for exhibitions and shows at various London galleries and museums, Autumn 2017 – Winter 2018

Read More

Subscribe

Stay up to date by subscribing and receive my posts by email.

  • Law
    • copyright
    • human rights
    • privacy law
    • trade marks
  • Fashion
    • advertising
    • celebrities
    • ecommerce
    • instagram
    • marketing
    • personality rights
  • Media and Entertainment
    • celebrities
    • cinema
    • digital media
    • free speech
    • journalism
    • music
    • sports
    • television
  • Digital Culture
    • artificial intelligence
    • image rights
    • deepfakes
    • privacy
    • reputation
© 2021Designed by Little Theme Shop