Skip to content

Kelsey Farish

  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references
  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references

Merger at the Movies

December 5, 2017October 22, 2020 Kelsey Farish Leave a comment
Merger at the Movies

British cinema chain Cineworld will buy American chain Regal Entertainment for £2.7 ($3.6) billion

The merger announcement comes at a time of tough competition amongst theatre chains as they struggle with long-term declines in audiences and changes in consumer behaviour.

Exclusive release windows continue to shorten.  Introduction of the Video Home System (VHS) technology in the late 1970’s posed a significant threat to the traditional studio-to-cinema distribution model. Studios and cinemas created the “release window” system in the 1980’s as a strategy to keep different film formats from competing with each other. Only after a film was shown exclusively in cinemas for a particular “window” of time would it then be released for home rental or purchase. In 1999, the window had an average of 27 weeks. Today, the average is just 15 weeks, with smaller films often having release windows of just a few weeks or even days. This poses a challenge to cinemas, as they have a shorter amount of time to exploit their monopoly on the film before it becomes available on DVD or on-demand.

Netflix: from disruptor to key industry player.  The 20 year-old company that started as a simple DVD home delivery service just announced plans to release 80 original films next year. With nearly 110 million subscribers around the world, has doubled its audience base since 2014. Other streaming platforms including Amazon, Hulu and YouTube have also made significant dents in Hollywood’s business model.

1024px-cineworld-svg
1280px-regal_entertainment_group_logo-svg

While Regal has not disclosed why it selling, there are many plausible benefits to consider.  Firstly, Regal and Cineworld would likely reduce expenses across a variety of departments, as redundancies between the two – for example in marketing or finance – would be streamlined. The two chains would also benefit from joined resources, including that of knowledgeable staff, pre-existing cinemas, and the leveraging of existing networks. Cineworld would also gain access to American customers by acquiring Regal, without the start-up costs traditionally involved in venturing into new jurisdictions.

Thanks to targeted advertising and greater engagement with media, audiences have in many ways come to expect a more personalised experience.  As such, a combined cinema operator may seek to offer a greater range of services and programming to its audiences. By focusing on a wider variety of genres, cinema styles, or even locations, the merged company may capture more consumers than they would as individual operators.

By way of example, Cineworld mainly shows international blockbusters and 3D movies at large cineplexes in shopping centres. However, in 2012 it bought Picturehouse Cinemas, a network of smaller cinemas which predominantly feature highbrow, independent and foreign films. By diversifying its reach, Cineworld is able to generate income from both ends of the movie-going spectrum. Something similar may happen with Regal and Cineworld if they were to focus on their relative strengths in various markets.

Stength in numbers.  Regal operates the second largest theatre circuit in the United States, with over 7,307 screens in 564 theatres. London-headquartered Cineworld is the second largest cinema operator in Europe, with 2,049 screens in nine countries. A merger between Regal and Cineworld would pose a significant threat to the largest theatre chain in the world, AMC. Originally known as American Multi-Cinema, AMC is owned by China-based Dalian Wanda Group, and boasts 2,200 screens in 244 theatres in Europe, and over 8,200 screens in 661 theatres in the United States.

Technicalities of the takeover.  Cineworld has obtained shareholder approval for the deal, which it intends to finance through a mixture of debt (such as bank loans or bonds) and a rights issue (where current investors will be asked to buy new shares). The transaction proposed will be classified as a reverse takeover, whereby Cineworld will obtain the legal entity of Regal by buying all (or a majority) of Regal’s underlying shares (stocks). Cineworld will therefore own all of Regal’s physical and non-tangible assets, as well as its debts and liabilities – which speaks to the importance of legal due diligence. I wonder if their completion meeting will feature a red carpet and spotlights?

cinemacommercialcorporate and commercialcorporate dealsm&a

Related Posts

Using AI in Film Studio Decision-Making
Using AI in Film Studio Decision-Making
Deepfakes: 2019 in Review
Deepfakes: 2019 in Review
From A to P: Amazon’s Third-Party Problem
From A to P: Amazon’s Third-Party Problem
“The Wife” and rights of attribution: an intellectual property perspective
“The Wife” and rights of attribution: an intellectual property perspective

Post navigation

New California law to address gender pay gap
Morality clauses and talent contracts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Kelsey Farish

Kelsey Farish

Media + Tech Lawyer

Got lost on my way to drama school, now a media and technology lawyer in London.

I write about deepfakes, publicity, privacy, advertising, the audiovisual sector, and creative industries from a legal perspective.

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

You might also like to read:

Monthly Muses » November 2017
Uncategorized ➤ November 1, 2017

Monthly Muses » November 2017

 

Read More
A Lawyer’s Take on Social Media Misdeeds: Part 1
Copyright ➤ June 10, 2020

A Lawyer’s Take on Social Media Misdeeds: Part 1

There are many reasons why you might want content removed from someone else's website or social media feed. Some of the most frequent grounds for complaint concern copyright or trade mark infringement. Defamation and harassment are also common painpoints, as are privacy and data protection concerns. This post, which is the first in a series, provides an overview of nine common offenses people commit on social media.

Read More
A Lawyer’s Take on Social Media Misdeeds: Part 2
Social Media ➤ June 13, 2020

A Lawyer’s Take on Social Media Misdeeds: Part 2

There are many reasons why you might want content removed from someone else's website or social media feed. Many complaints involve defamation or intellectual property rights infringement, and can be settled between the parties themselves through litigation. But sometimes the misdeeds perpetuated online can amount to a criminal offense, which may become a police matter. Here are some of the most common criminal acts committed on social media.

Read More

Subscribe

Stay up to date by subscribing and receive my posts by email.

  • Law
    • copyright
    • human rights
    • privacy law
    • trade marks
  • Fashion
    • advertising
    • celebrities
    • ecommerce
    • instagram
    • marketing
    • personality rights
  • Media and Entertainment
    • celebrities
    • cinema
    • digital media
    • free speech
    • journalism
    • music
    • sports
    • television
  • Digital Culture
    • artificial intelligence
    • image rights
    • deepfakes
    • privacy
    • reputation
© 2021Designed by Little Theme Shop