Skip to content

Kelsey Farish

  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references
  • Home
  • About
    • portfolio
    • Contact
    • T&Cs
    • Privacy Notice
  • LEGAL TOPIC
    • Confidentiality
    • Copyright
    • Data Protection
    • Expression
    • Image Rights
    • Publicity
    • Privacy
    • Reputation
    • Trade Marks
  • BUSINESS SECTOR
    • Advertising
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Brand Management
    • Deepfakes
    • Digital Platforms
    • ecommerce
    • Fashion
    • Film and TV
    • Music
    • News Media
    • Photography
    • Social Media
    • Sports
    • Start-ups
  • Student Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Buy my Bar Exam Study Schedule
    • upcoming events
    • case references

Deepfake Laws: What’s on the Statute Books?

October 27, 2019October 22, 2020 Kelsey Farish 1 comment
Deepfake Laws: What’s on the Statute Books?

There are many existing laws which can potentially be applied to problematic deepfakes, including those concerning fraud, privacy, defamation, stalking, and electoral law. But are these legal instruments sufficient to address deepfake risks, or are new laws needed? Given the risk that deepfakes pose, some lawmakers assert that new, specific regulations are needed to curtail the proliferation of the technology.

Here is a list of laws (including proposals for new legislation*) which specifically address deepfakes, last updated October 2019.

Media / Disinformation and Electoral Law

  • Title: AB-730 Elections – deceptive audio or visual media (link)
    Jurisdiction: California, USA
    Status: ✓ APPROVED by Governor on October 03, 2019
    Summary: Criminalises the distribution of audio or video that gives a false, damaging impression of a politician’s words or actions within 60 days of an election, but includes some exceptions.
  • Title: SB751 – Relating to the creation of a criminal offense for fabricating a deceptive video with intent to influence the outcome of an election (link)
    Jurisdiction: Texas, USA
    Status: ✓ APPROVED by State Senate on 1 September, 2019
    Summary: Creates a misdemeanour for creating deepfake videos “with intent to injure a candidate or influence the result of an election” if published and distributed within 30 days of an election.
  • Title: HR 3230 – Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability (“DEEPFAKES Accountability”) Act of 2019* (link)
    Jurisdiction: USA (Federal)
    Status: PROPOSED in Congress, referred to subcommittee for review.
    Summary:
     To combat the spread of disinformation through restrictions on deep-fake video alteration technology, and (amongst other things) establish a right on the part of victims of synthetic media to sue the creators and/or otherwise “vindicate their reputations” in court.

Sexual Content and Privacy Law

  • Title: House Bill 2678 – A BILL to amend and reenact § 18.2-386.2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; falsely created videographic or still image (link)
    Jurisdiction: Virginia, USA
    Status: ✓ APPROVED by General Assembly of Virginia July, 2019
    Summary: Update to the existing revenge porn laws, making it a misdemeanour to create deepfake photos or videos of someone without their consent.
  • Title: A08155 – AN ACT to amend the civil rights law, in relation to the right of privacy and the right of publicity* (link)
    Jurisdiction: New York, USA
    Status: PENDING in the State Senate
    Summary: Establishes the right of privacy and the right of publicity for both living and deceased individuals; the registration with the department of state of such rights of a deceased individual; and that the use of a digital replica for purposes of trade within an expressive work shall be a violation.
  • Title: Taking, making and sharing intimate images without consent* (link)
    Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
    Status: PENDING in consultation phase
    Summary: The Law Commission is now conducting a review of the existing criminal law including: section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (“revenge pornography”); voyeurism offences under section 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003; Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019; exposure under section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003; and the common law offence of outraging public decency.

Featured photo © h heyerlein

A08155AB 730CongressdeepfakedeepfakesDEEPFAKES Accountability Actdisinformationelection lawHB 2678HR 3230legislationmisinformationParliamentprivacyrevenge pornSB 751tech lawtechnologyUK lawUS law

Related Posts

Deepfakes and the Law: an excerpt from my Society of Computers & Law Webinar
Deepfakes and the Law: an excerpt from my Society of Computers & Law Webinar
The Tech Behind Deepfakes
The Tech Behind Deepfakes
Her Private Pain: £15,000 awarded for misuse of private information on Facebook
Her Private Pain: £15,000 awarded for misuse of private information on Facebook
Using AI in Film Studio Decision-Making
Using AI in Film Studio Decision-Making

Post navigation

Forging Authenticity: Experts’ workshop on Deepfake Technology, Risks and Governance
Deepfakes: 2019 in Review

One comment

  1. Pingback: Deepfakes: 2019 in Review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Kelsey Farish

Kelsey Farish

Media + Tech Lawyer

Got lost on my way to drama school, now a media and technology lawyer in London.

I write about deepfakes, publicity, privacy, advertising, the audiovisual sector, and creative industries from a legal perspective.

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

You might also like to read:

The Monarchy, Meghan, and Trade Marks
Advertising ➤ November 30, 2017

The Monarchy, Meghan, and Trade Marks

Kensington Palace announced this week that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are officially engaged, and are expected to marry next May. Before we dismiss the celebrations as just another celebrity extravaganza, it’s important to remember...

Read More
Social network, media company, host provider, neutral intermediary… what’s in a name for YouTube?
Copyright ➤ June 28, 2018

Social network, media company, host provider, neutral intermediary… what’s in a name for YouTube?

Media companies who call themselves social networks will have to recognize that they, too, have to take on responsibility for the content with which they earn their millions. -— Markus Breitenecker, CEO of Puls4 Who...

Read More
Deepfakes: 2019 in Review
Artificial Intelligence ➤ January 2, 2020

Deepfakes: 2019 in Review

By now, many people are aware of Deepfakes: a form of digital impersonation, in which the face and voice of a person can be superimposed into video and audio recordings of another individual. But much...

Read More

Subscribe

Stay up to date by subscribing and receive my posts by email.

  • Law
    • copyright
    • human rights
    • privacy law
    • trade marks
  • Fashion
    • advertising
    • celebrities
    • ecommerce
    • instagram
    • marketing
    • personality rights
  • Media and Entertainment
    • celebrities
    • cinema
    • digital media
    • free speech
    • journalism
    • music
    • sports
    • television
  • Digital Culture
    • artificial intelligence
    • image rights
    • deepfakes
    • privacy
    • reputation
© 2021Designed by Little Theme Shop